This morning I have been musing on a phrase in my Bible (thanks to Wordlive).

What are the implications of Jesus saying: “Whoever is not against us is for us…” (Mark 9:40)?

glasses and their caseIt’s a phrase that often sneaks under my radar when I look at that passage, but it bears thinking about. It’s an astonishingly optimistic approach that expands the horizons of what God is doing. Except for those who are actively opposing what Jesus and his followers are doing, the rest are included as on their side! It’s a bit like counting any abstentions as votes in favour rather than seeing them as ‘non-votes’ or even counting them as votes that are not in favour.

I received a message in Sunday School through the narrow theology of a well-meaning and deeply faithful follower of Jesus that we are under attack and should adopt a siege mentality. When I…

View original post 438 more words



Today, I sat at the back of the church I was visiting. It was a Church of England church which meant that we had to go up to the front for communion. Since I was at the back I had to wait for the front rows to go up to communion.

The children came back into the service from the groups they had been in during the sermon and, accompanied by their group leaders went up to the front to receive a blessing. They were given a small piece of the communion waver and then they returned to their groups.

As they went passed us one of the young girls called out to her father who was sitting next to me (and who had been commenting to me throughout the service, almost apologising for his daughter’s loudness). When his daughter left, he turned to me and explained ‘She’s excited because she was given a piece of the bread.’

I commented that it was always better when kids were involved in a service. I’m not sure he understood what I meant, he may have been worried about a strangers apparent interest in children being in the service.

I guess what I meant was here I was, about to take part in communion and I knew that I wasn’t anywhere near as excited or interested in it as that child had been. Moments before I had been considering my theological stand on the use of wafers instead of bread and considering whether this wine would be the same kind of communion wine that made me dizzy.

Then a child had appeared, hardly able to stand still because she was so excited to go to the front of the church and then so pleased to receive the bread that she had to tell her father about it straight away.

She was only young, perhaps didn’t fully understand the significance of what she was doing, but she knew it was a big deal, knew it was something to be excited about, something that gave her joy, something that needed to be shared.

And there I was, fully understanding, years of study and thought and discussion behind me and yet I was not experiencing that joy.

And which story is more interesting to hear? The one told in excitement or the one told with theological accuracy?

WordPress tells me to ask questions….

I don’t see the point.

Most of the time I just write this because it’s on my mind and writing it for a potential audience makes more sense than writing a diary for me. I’ve never got the hang of writing a diary. This is like my diary which I don’t write everyday ‘cus I don’t have enough to say everyday. No one asks questions in a diary, certainly not questions to be answered by anyone else.

So WordPress, I will not ask questions in order to make people like me more. I like me enough to reply to myself… and I’m pretty certain that doesn’t make me crazy. Or does it?